Legal Opinion

Marc A. Bell v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 4, 1996No. 94-6351PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENRY, Circuit Judge.

This appeal concerns the effect of rulings in a prior, somewhat unusually conducted municipal court case on a diversity action for damages. The district court concluded that the municipal court’s determination that there was probable cause for the arrest of the plaintiff-appellant Marc Bell precluded Mr. Bell from re-litigating his claims for assault, battery, false arrest, and malicious prosecution. The court therefore granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant Dillard Department Stores, Inc. (“Dillard”).

For two reasons, we conclude that Dillard is not entitled…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Standefer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Fletcher v. Atex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  5. Deepwater Investments, Limited v. Jackson Hole Ski Corporation and Paul M. McCollisterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Kyle Johnson Leticia Johnson v. Ivan Watkins Chris CallowayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  2. Burrell v. ArmijoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  3. DeGuelle v. CamilliCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  4. Colorado Ex Rel. Salazar v. ACE Cash Express, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2002
  5. McFarland v. ChildersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API