Legal Opinion

MILES INSURANCE & REALTY COMPANY v. Gilstrap

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 15, 1988No. 76094PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Benham, Judge.

Appellant contends that appellees’ recovery is barred by the four-year statute of limitation in OCGA § 9-3-30 and by the eight-year statute of repose in OCGA § 9-3-51, governing suits involving improvements to realty. We agree that it is barred by the statute of limitation and reverse.

In 1978, appellant constructed a house which, after several changes of ownership, was purchased in 1984 by appellees. Mr. Gil-strap discovered in early 1985 that there was a problem with the location of his house on his lot. A survey which was performed for him revealed that his house had been…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Corporation of Mercer University v. National Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1988
  2. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. Pattillo Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  3. Shaw v. PetersenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hanna v. McWilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  2. Broadfoot v. Aaron Rents, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  3. Broadfoot v. Citizens & Southern National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  4. Broadfoot v. Aaron Rents, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API