Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Sterling Electric Motors, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 13, 1940No. 9209PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
This opinion and the foregoing accompanying order arise from the declination of the National Labor Relations Board, for a period of many months, to act under § 10 (e) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 160(e), on our commitment to it to take further testimony on a charge against respondent of fraudulent deceit constituting an unfair labor practice. From facts later narrated, the delay appears to be purposed to facilitate the Board in pressing what is, in effect, an ex parte certiorari proceeding in the .Supreme Court to deprive the Sterling Electric…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sterling Electric Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- National Labor Relations Board v. American Potash & Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sterling Electric Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. StarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wayside Press, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Joseph Silverman v. National Labor Relations Board and Samuel M. Kaynard, Director, National Labor Relations Board Regional Office No. 29Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- National Labor Relations Board v. Haddock-Engineers, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- National Labor Relations Board v. FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sterling Electric Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.