Legal Opinion
Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Communications Workers
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided August 31, 1961No. Civ. No. 61-36PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KILKENNY, District Judge.
Action by plaintiff and counterclaim by defendant to secure declaratory judgment on certain provisions of a collective bargaining agreement between the plaintiff and defendant. Jurisdiction is available under the Labor Management Relations Act (29 U.S.C.A. § 185), and the Federal Declaratory Judgments Act (28 U.S.C. §§ 2201,2202).
Plaintiff is engaged in the business of transmission of communications in interstate commerce. Defendant, a labor organization, is representing employees of plaintiff in the state of Oregon. Since February 4, 1960, an agreement has been in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Mastro Plastics Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Miller v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Communications Workers of America, an Unincorporated Association v. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company, a Washington CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Ekstedt v. Village of New HopeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Penzien v. Dielectric Products Engineering Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Westbury Coal Mining Partnership v. J. S. & K. Coal Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1987
- Lake v. StubbertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.