Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Murphy

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1924No. Docket No. 95PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.

In this action the plaintiff is seeking to recover the initial payment on a preliminary agreement for the purchase of the lease and furniture of the Abbottsford apartments on Peterboro avenue, in the city of Detroit. The suit is brought on the theory that the defendants misrepresented the number of apartments in the building and the rentals to be derived therefrom, and that, following negotiations for a modification of its terms, there was a mutual rescission of the contract. A denial of these claims presented the issue tried out in the lower court. At the conclusion of the proofs both…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Germain v. LoudMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. City National Bank v. Price's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Kyselka v. Northern Assurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Funk v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. William P. Wells D/B/A Recmart, Cross-Appellant v. 10-X Manufacturing Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  2. Hannan Real Estate Exchange v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Tuomista v. MoilanenMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Gaval v. WojtowyczMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. William P. Wells D/B/A Recmart, Cross-Appellant v. 10-X Manufacturing Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API