Legal Opinion

Jones v. New York City Transit Authority

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided December 17, 1984PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

David B. Saxe, J.

There is an intensifying national concern regarding the issue of whether blind and deaf persons should serve as jurors.1 In this case, a personal injury matter involving substantial amounts of physical evidence, a blind person was sought to be excluded from jury service through the use of a challenge for cause based solely on his blindness. The issue that I must decide is whether his exclusion was improper under Judiciary Law § 510 (3). The facts in this particular case compel the court to grant the challenge for cause.

*586Initially, this case does not concern…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. People v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Lewinson v. CrewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
  5. People v. GuzmanNew York Supreme Court · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Galloway v. Superior Court of the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1993
  2. Commonwealth v. SusiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  3. People v. CaldwellCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1993
  4. Spinella v. Town of Paris Zoning Board of AppealsNew York Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API