Legal Opinion

United States v. Castro -Gomez

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided February 8, 2019No. 1:18-CR-187-RPPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT PITMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Under the Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA"), immigration judges are responsible for conducting proceedings that decide the inadmissibility or deportability of a noncitizen. 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(a)(1). Although the INA does not specify when jurisdiction vests in an immigration judge, federal regulations provide that jurisdiction vests when a "charging document" is filed with the immigration court. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.14(a). A charging document includes a notice to appear ("NTA"). 8 C.F.R. § 1003.13. But the INA and the federal regulations define "notice…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API