Legal Opinion

Mulholland v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 30, 1989No. 645-85TPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REGINALD W. GIBSON, Judge:

INTRODUCTION

Kenneth and Catherine Mulholland, husband and wife (taxpayers/plaintiffs herein), filed the instant tax refund suit on October *25330, 1985, seeking a refund of federal income taxes assessed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Commissioner) against their joint individual income tax returns for taxable years 1981 and 1982. This tax refund suit arose because the Commissioner determined that the method of accounting for deductible interest expense employed by Quincy Associates, Ltd. (Quincy), a partnership,1 Le., pursuant to the Rule of 78’s method,2…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Deputy, Administratrix v. Du PontSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Automobile Club of Mich. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Thor Power Tool Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bruce A. And Marianne S. Prabel v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  2. Mulholland v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  3. Mulholland v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
  4. Young Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
  5. Carroll v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API