Legal Opinion
Santiago v. Barnhart
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 27, 2006No. 05 CIV. 3918(VM)PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
MARRERO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Luz Santiago (“Santiago”) brought this action for review of the final determination by the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) denying her claims for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits under the Social Security Act (the “Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (“ § 405(g)”). Santiago now moves for judgment on the pleadings and the Commissioner cross-moves for a judgment on the pleadings. The Court concludes that remand is appropriate because the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) committed legal error by not properly applying the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ysabel Rosa v. John S. Callahan, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Elmer G. Berry v. Richard Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Darline Halloran v. Jo Anne Barnhart, as Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Craig v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Balodis v. LeavittDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Beckers v. ColvinDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2014
- Rivera v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Ridge v. BerryhillDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2018
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.