Legal Opinion

Glover v. Johnson

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided February 21, 1997No. 77-CV-71229PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING A STAY OF THE REMEDIAL PLAN AND COURT ORDERS

FEIKENS, District Judge. '

I. Summary

Defendants have moved for the immediate termination of remedial plans and court orders in effect in this case, pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA), Pub.L.No. 104-134, which amends 18 U.S.C. § 3626. Specifically, defendants argue that the provisions governing termination of prospective relief found at 18 U.S.C. § 3626(b)(1),(2), and (3) require termination of relief in this case.

While not stated in their motion, defendants argue in their brief that the automatic…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rust v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Martin v. Hunter's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1816
  4. United States v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  5. Hayburn's CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1792

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. James Benjamin v. Michael Jacobson, Commissioner of the Department of Correction of the City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  2. Ruiz v. JohnsonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1999
  3. Richard A. French v. Jack R. Duckworth, and United States of America, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  4. Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API