Legal Opinion
Package & Utility Drivers, Local No. 396 v. Hearst Publishing Co.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided July 6, 1962No. 62-328-KPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES M. CARTER, District Judge.
This is an action by the Package and Utility Drivers, Local No. 396, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, (hereinafter called Teamsters) to compel Hearst Publishing Company, Inc., (hereinafter called Company) to submit to arbitration under Title 29 U.S.C.A. § 185 [61 Stat. 156] (hereinafter called section 301).
Two questions are presented: (1) whether or not the Company is required to submit to arbitration, and (2) what effect an unfair labor practice has on the arbitrability of a certain case.
The Hearst…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- In Re the Arbitration Between International Association of MacHinists, District No. 15, Local No. 402, & Cutler-Hammer, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio v. American International Aluminum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers v. General Electric Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968