Bas v. Tingy
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court
4 U.S. 37 (____)
4 Dall. 37
Bas, Plaintiff in Error,
versus
Tingy, Defendant in Error.
Supreme Court of United States.
The case was argued by Lewis, and E. Tilghman, for the plaintiff in error, and by Rawle, and W. Tilghman, for the defendant.
The JUDGES delivered their opinions seriatim in the following manner:
MOORE, Justice.
This case depends on the construction of the act, for the regulation of the navy. It is objected, indeed, that the act applies only to future wars; but its provisions are obviously applicable to the present situation of things, and there is nothing to prevent an immediate…
2Cited by59 opinions
- Western Reserve Life Insurance v. MeadowsTexas Supreme Court · 1953
- Stankus v. New York Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- HOLTZMAN Et Al. v. SCHLESINGER Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Melvin R. Laird, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
- Padilla Ex Rel. Newman v. BushDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.