Legal Opinion
Montana Wilderness Ass'n v. McAllister
District Court, D. Montana
Decided September 29, 2009No. CV 07-39-M-DWM, CV 07-59-BLG-DWMPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DONALD W. MOLLOY, District Judge.
I. Introduction and Background
This Order resolves dispositive motions in consolidated cases presenting challenges to Gallatin National Forest Travel Management Plan and the associated Final Environmental Impact Statement managing recreation and travel activities in the Hyalite-Porcupine-Buffalo Horn Wilderness Study Area. Environmental Plaintiffs 1 have sued the Forest Service alleging that the Travel Plan violates the law by permitting increased motorized and mechanized activity within the statutorily designated Study Area. Multiple-Use Plaintiffs 2 have…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- The Lands Council v. McNairCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Asarco, Inc. v. U. S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States Postal Service v. GregorySupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Ranchers Cattlemen Action Legal Fund United Stock-Growers of America v. U.S. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- City of Angoon v. HodelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Citizens for Balanced Use v. Montana Wilderness Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Indigenous Envtl. Network v. U.S. Dep't of StateDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2018
- MONTANA WILDERNESS ASS'N v. McAllisterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- League of Wilderness Defenders/Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012