Reeves & Co. v. Miller
Indiana Court of Appeals
Prom Washington Circuit Court; Thomas B. BusMrk, Judge. Suit by Reeves & Co. against Noble Miller and another. Prom a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLairy, C. J.
On August 27, 1906, appellant entered into a written contract with appellees, whereby it sold to appel*340lees a sawmill for $2,625. The contract specifically described the property sold, and provided that appellees should give six notes, of $437.50 each, for the purchase price. It was also stipulated in the contract that the title to the machinery sold should not pass to the appellees, but should remain in the seller until the purchase price was fully paid. It further provided that the seller should have a right to retake possession of the property, in the event it should not be paid for in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kelley v. Newburyport & Amesbury Horse RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
- First National Bank v. RootIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Carmel Natural Gas & Improvement Co. v. SmallIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Oolitic Stone Co. v. RidgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
- Crowder v. ReedIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Public Savings Insurance Co. of America v. GreenwaldIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918