Legal Opinion

Fabick Bros. Equipment Co. v. Leroux

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 14, 1964No. 8183PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUARK, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment based on the warranty of a Cat which couldn’t hold its water.

Plaintiff Fabick Brothers Equipment Company sold to defendant James H. Le-roux “one used Cat.” (we understand this is the common, abbreviated, and popular term for a caterpillar tractor) “W/Hyd Dozer,” with equipment including “W/Cat #46 Hyd. Controls” and a “Cat. 6A Angle dozer,” at a price of $12,412.80. Taken in exchange was a “Farmall M. Tractor” and “Henry Back Hoe” at an agreed price of $3,500. Leroux executed an installment note (including time payment charges of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fisher v. MiceliSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  2. Dubinsky v. Lindburg Cadillac Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Perry v. VanmatreMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Dimick v. NoonanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1951
  5. Giraldin Bros. Real Estate Company v. StiansenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jake C. Byers, Inc. v. J.B.C. InvestmentsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Rufkahr Construction Co. v. WeberMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Dutcher v. HarkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  4. Countess v. StrunkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Foam-Tex Industries, Inc. v. Relaxaway CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API