Fabick Bros. Equipment Co. v. Leroux
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RUARK, Presiding Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment based on the warranty of a Cat which couldn’t hold its water.
Plaintiff Fabick Brothers Equipment Company sold to defendant James H. Le-roux “one used Cat.” (we understand this is the common, abbreviated, and popular term for a caterpillar tractor) “W/Hyd Dozer,” with equipment including “W/Cat #46 Hyd. Controls” and a “Cat. 6A Angle dozer,” at a price of $12,412.80. Taken in exchange was a “Farmall M. Tractor” and “Henry Back Hoe” at an agreed price of $3,500. Leroux executed an installment note (including time payment charges of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fisher v. MiceliSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Dubinsky v. Lindburg Cadillac Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1952
- Perry v. VanmatreMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
- Dimick v. NoonanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1951
- Giraldin Bros. Real Estate Company v. StiansenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jake C. Byers, Inc. v. J.B.C. InvestmentsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Rufkahr Construction Co. v. WeberMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Dutcher v. HarkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
- Countess v. StrunkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- Foam-Tex Industries, Inc. v. Relaxaway CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.