Legal Opinion

Mia Acupuncture, P.C. v. Mercury Insurance

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 9, 2009PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Ordered that the order is affirmed without costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant served various discovery requests, seeking, among other things, to conduct an examination before trial of plaintiff. Subsequently, defendant served plaintiffs assignor with a notice of deposition and notified plaintiffs counsel of the deposition request. When the assignor failed to appear for the deposition, defendant moved to dismiss the complaint, arguing that, by virtue of the assignment, party status may be imputed to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Leon v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Cardtronics, LP v. St. Nicholas Beverage Discount Center, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Schneider v. Melmarkets Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. National Bank of North Hudson v. KennedyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  5. Peter Doelger, Inc. v. L. Fatato, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cambridge Medical, P.C. v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 2010
  2. Bath Medical Supply, Inc. v. Allstate Indemnity Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API