Legal Opinion

Doyle v. Comm'r, Environmental Prot., No. Cv-90-59945-S (Apr. 5, 1991)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided April 5, 1991No. CV-90-59945-SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS I. NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS

The co-defendants L. D. Caldarella and the Commissioner of the Department of Environmental Protection [Commissioner] bring this motion to dismiss an appeal from an administrative agency decision brought by the plaintiffs Donald and Betty Doyle.

II. FACTS

In January of 1988 the co-defendant Caldarella, pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. 22a-361 (which regulated dredging, erecting structures and placement of fill in tidal, coastal of navigable…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Zizka v. Water Pollution Control AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Mystic Marinelife Aquarium, Inc. v. GillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  3. Red Hill Coalition, Inc. v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. Connecticut Water Co. v. BeausoleilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  5. Tarnopol v. Connecticut Siting CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API