Justice v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.
The jury fixed the sum of $500 for the taking of a right of way over farm land owned by Carl E. Justice and Beatrice Justice. The owners, feeling themselves aggrieved by the amount awarded, appeal and press two assignments of error.
The court refused appellants’ request that the jury be shown the land, and they cite §§ 906 to 920, inclusive, of Remington’s Revised Statutes of Washington, wherein the procedure for the condemnation of school sites is prescribed. Section 912, supra, provides, inter alia, that the jury shall be allowed to view the premises if all interested…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. BuescherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- Coos Bay Logging Co. v. BarclayOregon Supreme Court · 1938
- Hannan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Bellingham Bay & British Columbia Railroad v. StrandWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- United States ex rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. J. Cyril Johnson and Ray T. LindsayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- Murdock v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
- United States v. H. R. Johnson and John B. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970