Legal Opinion

Harrigan v. Prendergast

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided March 15, 1916PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York, in favor of defendant, entered upon a directed verdict.

1Opinion of the CourtBijur, J.

Plaintiff brings this action for the return of $1,150 deposited by him with the predecessor of the defendant, as comptroller of the city of New York, to *152discharge certain liens against funds in the possession of the city due to a certain contractor, the Philip T. Brown Company, which moneys were, plaintiff alleges, “ to be returned to plaintiff in the event that the, lienors failed to succeed in their lien or that the lien would expire or lapse. ’ ’

Upon the trial, plaintiff’s counsel undertook to prove the ownership of the money deposited in the plaintiff by the testimony of one of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Matter of Petition of ButlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. People, Ex Rel. Gilbert v. . LaidlawNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. De Wolf v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. Kruger v. PersonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  5. Rothschild v. GouldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Glidden v. FowlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Rosen v. 981 Union Avenue Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1920
  3. Levy v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API