Legal Opinion
Hansen Packing Co. v. Swift & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 20, 1939PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GALSTON, District Judge.
This is an action at law to recover treble damages for injuries suffered by the plaintiff as the result of the defendants’ alleged violation of the anti-trust laws of the United States.
The plaintiff was engaged in the business of purchasing and selling cattle, sheep, lambs, calves and hogs, collectively designated as live stock, and of processing, dressing and otherwise preparing "and marketing live stock and live stock products, and in the operation of a slaughter house and meat packing plant and other allied equipment and facilities near Butte, in the State of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Momand v. Universal Film Exchange, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1942
- Electric Theater Co. v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1953
- Schiffman Bros, Inc. v. Texas CoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
- Banana Distributors, Inc. v. United Fruit Company and Fruit Dispatch CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Olearchick v. American Steel FoundriesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.