Legal Opinion
In re Gillespie
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 6, 1940PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*592Motion to Confirm Report. (Capen Parcels.)
Nolan, J.
The owner of this property, none of which was actually taken in this proceeding, and which is separated from Parcel 855, taken by the city, by Harris street, a country road, has claimed compensation for damage to his property, by virtue of section 19 of chapter 724 of the Laws of 1905, and section 8 of chapter 725 of the Laws of 1905. Section 19 of chapter 724 of the Laws of 1905 provides that the owner or any person interested in real estate, contiguous to property taken or entered upon and used and occupied for the purposes contemplated by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Radcliff's Executors v. . Mayor, C. of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
- In re Board of Water SupplyNew York Supreme Court · 1911
- Matter of SimmonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- In re of SimmonsNew York Supreme Court · 1911
- Lester v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ciufo v. CiufoNew York Supreme Court · 1946
- Gervasi v. Board of Commissioners of Hicksville Water DistrictNew York Supreme Court · 1965
- In re the Acquisition of Rights of Way & Permanent Easements, by the Board of Supervisors, New York County Courts1940
- In re GillespieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- In re HuieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958