Legal Opinion
White v. Barry
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 23, 1942PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
The action is one for libel. The parties are lawyers. In an action brought by plaintiff’s wife against him, she was represented by the defendant and the plaintiff by Mr. Henry A. Uterhart. Respecting an order made in that action, the defendant wrote to Mr. Uterhart a letter the body of which is in this text:
“ White v. White
“ Dear Mr. Uterhart:
“ The enclosed notice of resettlement is made necessary by reason of the fact that your client, Mr. Peter White, either personally or through his representative, had the audacity to submit to the Court an order now on record, backed up with a plain…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fleckenstein v. FriedmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Morningstar v. . Lafayette Hotel Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1914
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rager v. McCloskeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Crane v. New York World Telegram Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1955
- Wenger v. Carledjon Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1957
- Cheatum v. WehleNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Sullivan v. Aircraft Services Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.