Legal Opinion

Elwood v. Tiemair

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 7, 1914No. 18,699PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Washington district court; John C. Hogin, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

This was an action brought by the appellant, Henry Elwood, to recover from the appellees, Henry Tiemair and wife, the commission alleged to be due for the sale of their farm, which consisted of about two hundred and forty acres. On June 30, 1910, Tiemair signed a written contract which purported to authorize Elwood to find a purchaser for his farm at a net price of $9000, Elwood to have all which he received above that price as a commission. It was provided that the purchaser should pay $2000 in cash to bind the bargain, and that Elwood…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Simon v. Goodyear Metallic Rubber Shoe Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
  2. Kingman & Co. v. StoddardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1898
  3. McDonough v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  4. Bell v. KeepersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  5. Brown v. South Joplin Lead & Zinc Mining Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Humphrey v. SieversSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  2. Cleaves v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  3. Bankers Mortgage Co. v. RobsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  4. Geiger v. CardwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  5. Jacobson v. NicholasWashington Supreme Court · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API