Legal Opinion

Karan v. Hoskins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 17, 2005PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, pursuant to RPAPL article 15 to determine claims to real property, the defendants Denise M. Rivera and Indymac Bank, FSB, appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Joseph, J.), dated May 24, 2004, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Pursuant to Real Property Law § 266, a bona fide purchaser or encumbrancer for value is protected in his or her title unless he or she had previous…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Marden v. . DorthyNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Kraker v. RollAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Anderson v. . BloodNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. Lum v. AntonelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. Lum v. AntonelliNew York Court of Appeals · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. LaSalle Bank National Ass'n v. AllyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. ABN AMRO Mortgage Group, Inc. v. StephensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. Maiorano v. GarsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. Fischer v. Sadov Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. In Re CohenDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API