Legal Opinion
Lum v. Antonelli
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 2, 1985PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs to defendants Domenico Antonelli, and Yee Woo Lum and Po Wah Lum (the “defendants Lum”), against plaintiff and defendant The Long Island Savings Bank.
The weight of the evidence more nearly comports with the findings at the Appellate Division (102 AD2d 258). We add only that there is no basis for recovery of attorneys’ fees by the bank against the defendants Lum, or against defendant Antonelli. As to the defendants Lum, any such liability they might have had under the original mortgage was…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lum v. AntonelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3Cited by44 opinions
- John Deere Insurance Co. v. GBE/Alasia Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Osborne v. ZornbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- ABN AMRO Mortgage Group, Inc. v. StephensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Hoffman v. KrausAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Mattera v. MatteraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.