Legal Opinion

Trent v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided April 26, 1943No. Record No. 2684PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

The defendant has been convicted of keeping a house of ill fame. Our statute, which governs this subject, reads:

“Keeping house of ill-fame; how punished; general character of house may be proved.—If any person keep a house of ill-fame, resorted to for the purpose of prostitution or lewdness, he shall be confined in jail not exceeding one year and fined not exceeding two hundred dollars; and, in a prosecution for this offense, the general character of such house may be proved.” Code, section 4548.

The defendant kept a boarding house and was under contract with the Newcomb Fish° Company to give…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Houston v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1890
  2. State v. GardnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  3. Wilson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. People v. MarronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. State v. PylesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Riley v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Hicks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1951
  3. State v. HaskinsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  4. Gaskill v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1946
  5. Jersey v. HaskinsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API