Legal Opinion

Liggett v. Rohr

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1940No. 8934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hatcher, Judge:

In 1899, Mary E. Queen and her husband, in consideration of one dollar and love and affection, executed an instrument, without warranty, granting to their son,. Lony, their daughter, Bessie, and two other children, a tract of 3 roods and 30 poles. The instrument was promptly recorded. Following the granting clause and the description of the tract, is a provision, of which the pertinent part is: “Under the following conditions, that this grant does not take effect until the death of the said Mary E. Queen * *

In 1919, Mrs. Queen and Bessie executed a deed of trust, which included…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lauck v. LoganWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Morison v. American Ass'nSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909
  3. Rust v. Commercial Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Spangler v. VermillionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lumpkin v. American Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  2. Walls v. ClickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Jividen v. JividenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API