Legal Opinion

Savchuk v. Randal Rush

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 10, 1976No. 45556Published

1Opinion

Upon Rehearing

After a rehearing, the following opinion was filed on October 20, 1978.

*497Considered and decided by the court en banc.

Wahl, Justice

On remand from the United States Supreme Court for further consideration in light of Shaffer v. Heitner, 433 U. S. 186, 97 S. Ct. 2569, 53 L. ed. 2d 683 (1977). For the reasons below, we distinguish Shaffer v. Heitner, supra, and hold that the assertion of jurisdiction pursuant to Minn. St. 571.41, subd. 2, as limited by our earlier decision in Savehuk v. Rush, 311 Minn. 480, 245 N. W. 2d 624 (1976), vacated and remanded, 433 U. S. 902, 97 S. Ct. 2964,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Harris v. BalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API