Legal Opinion

Burke Grain Co v. Stinchcomb

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 21, 1918No. 8701PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from County Court, Oklahoma County; Wiliam H. Ewick, Judge. Action by the Burke Crain Company against L. Stinchcomb, doing business under the name and style of the Stinchcomb Grain Company. Judgment for defendant, motion for new trial overruled, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

COLLIER, 0.

This action was commenced in the county court of Oklahoma county by the plaintiff in error against the defendant in error to recover the sum of $234.36, on account of overdrafts upon the sale of six ears of corn, and averred that the said matter had been adjusted by arbitration by and between the parties to this action, and that the board of arbitration had awarded the plaintiff herein the sum of $234.-36, and that said defendant in error refused to abide by said arbitration decision, although he had previously agreed to do so, in writing.

The defendant filed an unverified…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Deal v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Carris v. John R. Thomas & Associates, P.C.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  2. Hughes v. National Fuel Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Inglis v. TrickeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Mitchell v. MurphySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Trojan Drilling Co. v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API