Cochran v. Chitwood
Illinois Supreme Court
Wbit op Eebob to the Circuit Court of Marion County; the Hon. R. S. Candy, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott
This was an action of assumpsit, brought on a promissory note. The defense sought to be interposed is, that there was a failure of the consideration for which the note was given. It was given to secure the purchase money of a pair of mules, sold by the agent of the plaintiff to the defendant Chitwood. It is alleged, that the agent of the plaintiff warranted the mules to be sound, when, in fact, they were not sound, and by reason of the unsoundness, they both died shortly after they were sold to the defendant.
There is a conflict of evidence as to whether there was, in fact, any warranty as to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Marckle v. HaskinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kilgore v. BruceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
- International Harvester Co. v. LawyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Smith v. Jefferson BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
- Pardridge v. Joel J. Bailey & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1886
- Hurd v. MarpleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1878
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.