Legal Opinion

Schwem's License

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 7, 1917No. Appeal, No. 164PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal, No. 164, Oct. T., 1916, by Joseph S. Reitz et al., Remonstrants, from order of Q. S. Clearfield Co., Jan. T., 1916, No. 23, granting a wholesale liquor license in the matter of Ed. D. Schwem Company’s application. Application for wholesale liquor license. Before Bell, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was the order granting the license. ■

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Henderson, J.,

This case comes up on an appeal of Joseph S. Reitz et al., remonstrants against the granting of a license to E. D. Schwem Company to sell liquor at wholesale. One of the objections urged against the granting of the license was that the application therefor was not advertised as required by the Act of July 30, 1897, P. L. 467. Section 3 of that act directs that the clerk of the Court of Quarter Sessions cause to be published a list containing the names of all applicants for license, their respective residences and the places for which applications are made, in three…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harris v. MercurSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  2. Petition of RaudenbuschSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  3. Norwegian StreetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1876
  4. English's LicenseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  5. Sun & Banner Publishing Co. v. BennettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. Ed. D. Schwem Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API