Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Liberty Country Wear, Inc. & Riordan Fabrics Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 29, 1950PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHofstadter, J.
The petitioner, a Massachusetts corporation, which has its principal place of business in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and is not doing business in this State, appearing specially, moves to vacate the service upon it by registered mail at its home office of a notice of arbitration. The notice of arbitration was given by the National Federation of Textiles, Inc. pursuant to an agreement between the petitioner and the respondent. The petitioner asserts that the arbitration clause, printed on the reverse side of the agreement, does not bind it and that in any case it has not consented to the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Matter of Zimmerman v. . CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Gilbert v. BurnstineNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- In Re the Arbitration Between Albrecht Chemical Co. & Anderson Trading Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Matter of Tanenbaum Textile Co. v. SchlangerNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Battle v. General Cellulose Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Berner v. United Airlines, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1950
- HARBISON-FISCHER MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC. v. Mohawk Data Sciences Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. AlexiouDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Brownwood Manufacturing Co. v. Tanenbaum Textile Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.