Legal Opinion

Lusardi v. Lusardi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 16, 1991PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Casey, J.

At issue on this appeal is whether amendments to Workers’ Compensation Law § 2 (4) and § 54 (6), which excluded workers’ compensation coverage for an employee who is the sole shareholder and executive officer of the corporate employer unless the employer affirmatively elects such coverage (L 1982, ch 396), are applicable to workers’ compensation insurance policies which were issued prior to the effective date of the amendments. The Workers’ Compensation Board originally decided that the amendments were applicable to this case since claimant’s accident occurred…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Murphy v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Claim of Busch v. Austin Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
  4. County of Rensselaer v. City of TroyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. Matter of Small v. Gibbs Press, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1928

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Estate of Re v. Kornstein Veisz & WexlerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  3. Gonzalez v. New York State Department of HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Moynihan v. New York State Employees' Retirement SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. Gleason v. Holman Contract Warehousing, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API