Legal Opinion
Venti v. EDS
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided December 13, 2002No. 6:00-cv-06616PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, Chief Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Rose Venti (“plaintiff’) commenced this action against her employer, defendant EDS, alleging that EDS took adverse employment actions against her and eventually terminated her on account of her age, in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. § 621 (“ADEA”), and the New York Human Rights Law, N.Y. EXEC. L. § 296 et seq. (“NYHRL”). Before the Court is EDS’s motion for summary judgment brought pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 56. For the reasons that follow, EDS’s motion is granted.
BACKGROUND
In October 1999,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brierly v. Deer Park Union Free School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- Lener v. Hempstead Public SchoolsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Lahens v. AT&T Mobility Puerto Rico, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2020
- Lahens v. AT&T Mobility Puerto Rico, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2020