Legal Opinion

Texas & N. O. R. v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 1, 1937No. 3523PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, Justice

(after stating the case as above).

The pension system of the S. A. & A. P. Ry. Co. applied only to employees who had attained a certain age and had been in the service of the company for twenty years. Appellant asserts there is no evidence Scherle had served that length of time, or that the G. H. & S. A. or appellant had assumed the payment of the pension awarded Scherle by the S. A. & A. P. Ry. Co.

The records of the pension board show Scherle was awarded a pension which was approved by the first vice president as heretofore stated. It was therefore shown Scherle was eligible for a pension…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Zwolanek v. Baker Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  2. George A. Fuller Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1926
  3. King v. FinchIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Fickling v. PollardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  5. Gale v. CoreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rubin v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  2. John E. Mitchell Co. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API