Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sabrina Robertson and Walter Robertson v. the Kearney Companies, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 25, 2021No. 2020-CA-0605Published

1Dissent

SABRINA ROBERTSON AND * NO. 2020-CA-0605 WALTER ROBERTSON * COURT OF APPEAL VERSUS * FOURTH CIRCUIT THE KEARNEY COMPANIES, INC. * STATE OF LOUISIANA * * ******* JCL LOBRANO, J., DISSENTS AND ASSIGNS REASONS. I respectfully dissent. The record presented by the defendant, The Kearney Companies, Inc. (“Defendant”), in support of its motion for summary judgment presents a genuine issue of material fact. The hole depicted in the photographs submitted by Defendant is in asphalt. However, in her deposition, Mrs. Robertson testified repeatedly that she tripped in a hole on the pathway, and Mr.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hines v. GarrettSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  2. Broussard v. State ex rel. Office of State BuildingsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2013
  3. Roy Bufkin, Jr. v. Felipe's Louisiana, LLCSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2014
  4. Mashburn v. CollinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
  5. Pitre v. Louisiana Tech UniversitySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API