Legal Opinion

United States v. Guobadia

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 6, 2021No. 19-3244-crUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

19-3244-cr United States v. Guobadia UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Groh v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. Ryan CanfieldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. Antonio Duran SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  5. Stuart v. GaySupreme Court of the United States · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API