Legal Opinion

Duff v. Bonner Building Supply, Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1983No. 14822PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKES, Justice.

Appellant Duff bought lumber paneling, asserted to be kiln-dried, from respondent Bonner Building Supply. To be certified in the industry as kiln-dried, lumber must have a moisture content not exceeding 19%. However, in a group of 80 boards, four of those boards may have a moisture content of more than 19%, and the group will still qualify as kiln-dried.

Duff took the lumber which he had purchased to his home, stored it in his garage under cover, and gradually installed it as paneling in a living room in his home over a three week period. The paneling subsequently shrank, up to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shields v. Morton Chemical CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Henderson v. Cominco American, IncorporatedIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Hoffman v. Simplot Aviation, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Duff v. Bonner Building Supply, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. H & v Engineering, Inc. v. Idaho State Board of Professional Engineers & Land SurveyorsIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Millenkamp v. Davisco Foods International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Dickerson v. Mountain View Equipment Co.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Meldco, Inc. v. Hollytex Carpet Mills, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Bernard v. RobyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API