In Re Insurance Brokerage Antitrust Litigation
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FISHER, Circuit Judge.
At issue in this consolidated appeal are the standards a district court applies when deciding whether to certify a settlement-only class, approve a class settlement, and approve class counsel’s petition for attorneys’ fees. More specifically, we are presented with challenges to the District Court’s orders granting final approval of a $121,800,000 settlement and a $28,000,000 settlement, as well as to the District Court’s order approving an award of $29,500,000 for attorneys’ fees and expenses in conjunction with the larger of the two settlements.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by177 opinions
- In Re Insurance Brokerage Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Howard Hess Dental Laboratories Inc. v. Dentsply International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Sullivan v. DB Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- D.E. v. Central Dauphin School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- In Re National Football League Players Concussion Injury LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
172 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.