Legal Opinion
People v. Lomoso
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 5, 1954PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
The defendant appeals from a judgment rendered after a trial convicting him of the crime of robbery in the first degree. He is presently serving a sentence of not less than ten years nor more than eleven years.
The defendant is not represented by counsel and the District Attorney with commendable fairness has directed our attention to a problem arising from the fact that a portion of the verbatim testimony is missing. The Code of Criminal Procedure requires the judgment roll on appeal to include an accurate transcript of “ the stenographic minutes of the entire proceedings of the trial ”.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. HinesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- People v. CittrolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- People v. DeWilkowskaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re Robert P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- People v. KenefickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. ColumboAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- People v. AuthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Cassella v. ManikasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.