Legal Opinion
People v. Kenefick
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 15, 1988PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting defendant of second degree murder and a related weapon possession charge, defendant’s principal claim is that the loss of a portion of the trial transcript deprived him of due process of law and the right to effective appellate counsel. There is no merit to this claim. A reconstruction hearing (see, People v Carney, 73 AD2d 9) established that the missing portion of the transcript contained testimony of three witnesses concerning defendant’s possession of the gun used in the killing. Defendant did not dispute that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. GlassNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. RiveraNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- People v. BellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
- Peolple v. CarneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. AndinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. HerndonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. MeyersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025