Legal Opinion

Ott v. Tindal

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 21, 1989No. 22966PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Finney, Justice:

Appellant, D. Leslie Tindal, Commissioner of the South Carolina Department of Agriculture (Department), appeals from an order of the circuit court which reversed the Commissioner’s reduction of compensation for losses claimed by respondents, Jimmy Ott and Calvin Grooms, under the South Carolina Dealers and Handlers Guaranty Fund Act, S. C. Code Ann. § 46-41-200 to -250 (1976). We affirm the circuit court’s order.

In January and February 1986 respondents sold and delivered grain to Agripen Grain Company, Inc. Under their contracts with Agripen, Ott was to be paid $2.95 per…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Williams Furniture Corp. v. Southern Coatings & Chemical Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  2. Parker v. South Carolina Dairy CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Garris v. Governing Board of the South Carolina Reinsurance FacilitySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API