Graugnard v. Capital Area Transit System
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.
li>We granted certiorari in response to the writ application filed by Capital Area Transit System (CATS), challenging the overruling peremptory exceptions raising objections of prescription, peremption, no cause of action and no right of action based *28on the trial court’s conclusion that the sixty-day limitation period for contesting the legality of a tax authorized by an election 1 held on April 21, 2012, is inapplicable to the claims of unconstitutionality asserted by plaintiffs, Gregory Milton Graugnard and William L. Smith, Jr. Because we hold that the sixty-day period provided in La. R.S.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Owens v. OkureSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Cipriano v. City of HoumaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Fair Assessment in Real Estate Assn., Inc. v. McNarySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.