Legal Opinion
Blyther v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 17, 1995No. 93-CV-1433PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Concurring opinion by Associate Judge RUIZ at p. 658.
2Per curiam
Geraldine Blyther appeals from an order granting summary judgment in favor of Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company (C & P) in an action for personal injuries. The pertinent facts and history of the case are detailed in the trial judge’s orders of February 2, 1993 and October 15, 1993 and summarized in the concurring opinion of Judge Ruiz.
Substantially for the reasons stated by the judge in his order of October 15, 1993, as described by Judge Ruiz, we conclude that Ms. Blyther’s substantive contentions are without merit. Moreover, even…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.
3Cases cited13 opinions
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hansford P. Miller v. Jackson AviromCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Dictograph Products Company, Inc. v. Sonotone Corporation, Emil Henry Greibach and S. Michael PinelesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- In Re MeltonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Donald J. Johnson v. Patrick H. BurkenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- Arthur v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- Williams Ex Rel. Williams v. Vel Rey Properties, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Sowell v. WalkerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- In Re Estate of BarnesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Johnson v. Payless Shoe Source, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004