Legal Opinion

Pietrini Corp. v. Agate Const. Co., Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 13, 2006PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY PANELLA, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, The Pietrini Corporation, appeals from the order entered on April 21, 2005, in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, which denied Pietri-ni’s motions for penalties and attorney’s fees under the prompt pay provisions of the Pennsylvania Procurement Code. After a careful review, we reverse.

¶ 2 The litigation underlying this appeal arose out of the construction of a tower foundation to support a tram line spanning the Delaware River (“the project”). In November of 2000, the Delaware River Port Authority (“DRPA”), a public authority, engaged…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thunberg v. StrauseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Cummins v. Atlas Railroad Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. On-Point Technology Systems, Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. A. Scott Enterprises v. City of Allentown, Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Zimmerman v. Harrisburg Fudd I, L.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Department of General Services v. Pittsburgh Building Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. A. Scott Enterprises, Inc. v. City of AllentownCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Clairton Slag, Inc. v. Department of General ServicesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API