Legal Opinion

Borgman v. Bultema

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1920No. Calendar No. 29,411PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Bill by William Borgman and others against Harry Bultema and others for an injunction. On motion of plaintiffs to dismiss an appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This case is before this court upon motion of the plaintiffs and appellees for an order placing it upon the present October term docket of this court for argument, or for an order dismissing the appeal of the defendants herein for the following reasons:(1) That said cause is not now upon the docket of this court for the present October term, because of the neglect of the said defendants, appellants, and failure on their part to comply with the terms of certain stipulations entered into by them, and of record in this court.(2) Because of the fact that under all of the circumstances connected…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Laughlin v. BerensCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  2. Bradford v. SchmuckerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
  3. Wechsler v. ZenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Tulsa v. JonesDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1945
  5. Powers & Co. v. American Society of Tool EngineersMichigan Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API