Legal Opinion

Sheridan v. Weinberger

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 2, 1987No. Civ. 87-0955Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

NEALON, Chief Judge.

Presently before the court is a motion of defendants First Eastern Bank, N.A. and First Eastern Corporation to dismiss Count III of plaintiffs’ Complaint. For the reasons set forth below, the motion to dismiss will be denied, but plaintiffs will be directed to file an amended pleading.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs were formerly shareholders in the Hawley Bank. At all relevant times, defendant Weinberger was a director of the Hawley Bank. See document 11 of the record at 2. 1 The relationship of defendants Robert Romich and Patricia Romich to the Hawley Bank is…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Haroco, Inc. v. American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, Walter E. Heller International Corporation, & Ronald J. GrayheckCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. Gilbert Roeder, Etc. v. Alpha Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API