Legal Opinion

Crossley v. Connecticut Fire Ins.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

Decided April 6, 1886PublishedCited by 7 opinions

At Law.

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

This is an action at law on a policy of fire insurance. In advance of the trial, and from considerations of convenience, counsel have been heard to argue certain questions which will arise on the trial, in order that they may be provisionally determined. The same questions will also arise in the case of Reed v. Fire Ins. Co. of Philadelphia, and counsel therein have also, been heard to argue those questions. The policies in question contain the following provisions:

“In ease of any loss or damage the company, within sixty days after the insured shall have submitted a statement as provided in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. President of Delaware & Hudson Canal Co. v. Pennsylvania Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Reed v. Washington Fire & Marine InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  3. Old Saucelito Land & Dry Dock Co. v. Commercial Union Assurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Allegre v. Maryland InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1824
  5. Robinson v. Georges InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1840

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States Asphalt Refining Co. v. Trinidad Lake Petroleum Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1915
  2. Daniher v. Grand Lodge Ancient Order of United WorkmenUtah Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Mutual Fire Ins. of New York v. AlvordCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1894
  4. Harrison v. German-American Fire Ins.U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Iowa · 1895
  5. Springfield Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API