Legal Opinion

People v. Strempack

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 31, 1988PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defense counsel’s failure to make a suppression motion prior to negotiating a plea bargain for his client does not, on this record, constitute ineffective assistance of counsel. Although defendant might have prevailed on such a motion, success was by no means certain. Had the suppression motion been denied, it is doubtful that the favorable bargain counsel obtained for defendant would still have been available. Thus, defense counsel’s representation was consistent with a legitimate and ultimately successful…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. RiveraNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. People v. BennNew York Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. People v. EnglishAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. People v. HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. People v. EaddyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. People v. MackeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. People v. VanterpoolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API