Legal Opinion

Blaine v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1937No. Nos. 23966 to 23970 incl. Affirmed in part and reversed in part and remandedPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Orr

Separate appeals have been taken from five judgments entered in assumpsit actions in the superior court of Cook county to recover interest on judgments of condemnation. The original actions were instituted by property owners whose property had been condemned under the Local Improvement act in order to widen certain streets in Chicago. In each of these cases judgments for varying amounts of interest on the several judgments were entered in favor of the property owners and against the city of Chicago, appellant here. The five cases have been consolidated and the case of Anita McCormick Blaine…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. BarbianIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Cook v. South Park CommissionersIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Feldman v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Turk v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  5. City of Chicago v. McCluerIllinois Supreme Court · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Blakeslee's Storage Warehouses, Inc. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
  2. City of Chicago v. SalingerIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Tracey v. ShanleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
  4. Lewis v. Stran-Steel Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  5. Chapralis v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1945

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API